BIM & coordination automation
Revit add-ins, clash review workflows, model QA, report automation. The repetitive modelling and coordination work, turned into buttons.
BIM-first automation studio
BIMSpoke builds custom BIM automation — Revit tools, clash dashboards and the systems around them — shaped to how your team actually works. Less manual work, fewer mistakes, better control of your project data.
Copying data between systems. Re-checking the same models by hand. Rebuilding the same reports. Chasing status across folders and spreadsheets with no live overview. It works — but it’s slow, it’s repetitive, and it’s exactly where mistakes creep in.
Revit add-ins, clash review workflows, model QA, report automation. The repetitive modelling and coordination work, turned into buttons.
Extracting, cleaning, structuring and reporting on project data — including AI where it actually earns its place, not for its own sake.
Dashboards and systems that live under your own ribbon, logo and language.
And when a tool needs a full system behind it — database, dashboard, deployment, the lot — BIMSpoke builds that end to end.
A growing set of tools built for real project workflows. More land here as they ship.
Navisworks clash reports, turned into a Revit-connected review workflow.
A Revit tool that automates pipe insulation setup and standardises a fiddly manual workflow.
Case study · anonymised
A coordination team was getting useful information out of Navisworks — but the workflow around it was still entirely manual.
Impact — honest, no inflated numbers
White-label
BIMSpoke can deliver tools that live entirely under your company’s identity — your ribbon, your logo, your terminology. Your clients see in-house capability; your team gets a tool that feels native. Built, and quietly maintained, by BIMSpoke.
Start here
Before any big commitment, BIMSpoke takes one workflow apart in 10 focused hours: map it, test what’s actually possible, and — where the workflow allows — build a working proof of concept. You walk away with either a working demo or a clear written feasibility, spec and estimate. Either way, it’s yours to keep.
€1,500 + VAT · no long contract · a clear go/no-go after 10 hours
If there’s no realistic automation worth building, I’ll tell you — and you don’t pay for the sprint.
Say a tool takes around 80 hours to build — roughly €12,000 + VAT. If it saves a team 6 hours a week at an internal cost of €80/hour, that’s about €2,000 a month, and the build pays for itself in roughly six months — before counting the mistakes it prevents and the overview it adds.
Real numbers vary by workflow. This is an example, not a promise.
Contact
Tell me one workflow your team repeats every week. I’ll tell you, honestly, whether it’s worth automating — usually within a day.